H.GREEN-COURSE HUB
  • COURSE PAGES
  • Fieldtrips/Events
  • LINKS/RESOURCES
  • STUDENT GALLERY
  • RESEARCH BLOG
  • Lab/Press Sign Up

I Love Micheal Borremans

11/16/2017

 
Victoria Mitchell
 
I just really want to talk about Michaël Borremans. I absolutely love the work he produces and he is such an inspiration for my own work. He is a Belgian painter born in 1963 and his pieces possess such disturbing and visceral content while being the most mundane. He used to be a photographer (and went to school for it) but ended up teaching himself to paint. Probably because he used to be so involved with photography, his paintings are created by meshing and manipulating images from old photos into paintings that he makes his own.

​He’s still very active and continues to make amazing work, but he never seems to come off as pretentious even with his success and talent. He often claims that he may work in the studio for hours and he does not produce anything of worth. He is humbled. He is able to create his own personal world that seems as if it is such a realized, large world. Borremans seems to pride himself on is ability to avoid labeling with the figurative painting world. He does not paint portraits, but characters and these characters are what define him.For instance, the image below is a perfect example of how his images are so easily able to grab a viewer’s attention. Simply stating the obvious: this painting is weird. It doesn’t make sense, but there is not enough information for one to explain why it doesn’t. It is titled The Angel, but the image does not allude to average connotations of what an expected angel would look like. A blackened face, somber stature, and unknown environment, create a work that is inhabited. 

Picture
Borremans has also made it clear that he is rather ashamed of his subject. In an art world that celebrates figurative painters, he finds himself uncomfortable with the title. This may be because of his hatred of most figurative painters with their trite subject matter and personal technique that tries creating an impossible—and rather ridiculous—illusion. Borremans does not care for maintaining such an egoist form of representation within the painting world. He often chooses to reveal the canvas and paint in a way to elicit emotions, not try and paint something just to look nice in a collector’s house.
Picture

Again, I can’t help but admire the subtle nuances of his work that truly invoke such complex feelings. This piece, The Devil’s Dress II, is haunting. Even with its modest subject and simple composition, it manages create a series of thoughts: why is she there? What is she wearing? Why is she wearing that? Why is she on the ground? Is she okay? I feel that the numerous questions with no explanation is the real power in Borremans work and why it makes him such an enigmatic painter. 

Picture
​I truly feel that his work is made in such a way that he doesn’t need to do much else. He can just make the work he wants and enjoy hating when others call him a “figurative painter”. 



Sources: 
https://www.artsy.net/artist/michael-borremans
https://www.apollo-magazine.com/the-modern-mysteries-of-michael-borremans/
​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhhUmwmlMtc

P.S. I have no idea why the fonts are different?? I tried everything I could think of? Was it because I copied and pasted it from a word doc?
Heather B
11/20/2017 05:14:16 pm

Upon first glance, I thought the first two images in this post were photographs. When I read through, I discovered that the artist manipulates photographs to incorporate into his paintings- a mix of realism and surrealism. Borremans' characters are extremely interesting to me because of their elusive profiles and odd poses.

Margarett
11/20/2017 09:17:49 pm

Micheal Borreman’s work is unlike most art I am usually drawn to. It is very unique in it’s content, and seems to leave the viewer with many questions. It would be interesting to have some of the audience record what they thought about each piece and see the differences. I am amazed by the skill and accuracy of his work, at first glance I thought the first two images were photographs instead of paintings. Which painting interests you the most? I am very intrigued by these images, thank you for sharing!

Monica W
11/21/2017 10:06:46 pm

I find Michael Borremans work very interesting and there seems to be elements of wonder and darkness all at the same time. The minimal color palettes of his paintings create a desolation state. The first painting appears to have "blackface" and may offend some people and I'm unsure what Borremans trying to convey in this art piece. The realistic style of painting is very good and the paintings do make me think.


Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Altered Books
    Artists
    Artists' Books
    Asian Artists
    Asian Books
    Asian Paper
    Asian Typefaces
    Ceramics
    Collections
    Comics & Graphic Novels
    Designers
    Digital Art
    DIY
    Environmental Impacts
    Feminism
    Fore-Edge Painting
    Herbal
    History Of Paper
    History Of The Book
    History Of Type
    Illuminated Manuscripts
    Interviews
    Letterpress
    Letterpress Shops
    Marbling
    Museums
    On-demand Book Publishing
    Paper Fibers
    Papermaking
    Phoenix
    Photographic Artist Book
    Photography
    Photopolymer
    Pop-ups
    Portland
    Printmaking Techniques
    Rare Books
    Sculptural Paper
    Software
    Technology
    Type Foundry
    Typography
    Walter Hamady
    Watermarks
    Zines

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • COURSE PAGES
  • Fieldtrips/Events
  • LINKS/RESOURCES
  • STUDENT GALLERY
  • RESEARCH BLOG
  • Lab/Press Sign Up